Loading...

Home > Port Forward > Port Forward Via Ipsec Tunnel

Port Forward Via Ipsec Tunnel

Contents

For this demonstration to help keep your sanity, we've left it at the full subnet. 4) Test it out!  The best method to test this is to telnet to port 36008 ip nat inside source static udp 172.16.1.2 500 interface Serial1/0 500 !--- This allows UDP traffic for the Serial1/0 !--- interface to be statically mapped to the inside !--- IP address We need to get Outlook Web Access working to the outside world, but we want the port 443 data to flow through our local Fortigate for IPS, DLP, etc. this is tracert on pc:192.168.5.10 to pc:192.168.100.10 (Compare the second hop in picture below) in opposite direction, tracert on pc:192.168.100.10 to pc:192.168.5.10 ( it go out to internal interface, not DMZ http://swiftinv.com/port-forward/port-forward.html

ip nat inside source list 1 interface Serial1/0 overload !--- This allows PAT to be used for regular Internet traffic. Advertisement Related ArticlesQ: What firewall ports should we open to make IPSec work through our firewalls? Common server ports are 21, 22, 80, 110, 143, 3389 Check which ports are open on your server, head back to Step 1) and use this port instead. failed: 0 #pkts not decompressed: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0 #send errors 7, #recv errors 0 local crypto endpt.: 172.16.1.2, remote crypto endpt.: 209.165.200.2 path mtu 1500, media mtu 1500 current https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/580870-fortigate-port-forwarding-over-vpn-tunnel

Pptp Pass Through

Native Rem. Top pukkita Forum Guru Posts: 1981 Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:09 pm Reputation: 195 Location: Spain Re: Port forward through IPSEC tunnel 0 Quote #11 Thu Jul 02, 2015 ip audit po max-events 100 no ftp-server write-enable ! ! ! !

Tip : Not all routers are created equal ! Current configuration : 986 bytes ! Unfortunately, most vendors don’t make the VPN pass through capabilities of their products clear in their documentation, nor do they have support staff properly trained to provide this information either. L2tp Pass Through VPN-Gateway1#show crypto isakmp sa dst src state conn-id slot 209.165.200.2 209.165.201.2 QM_IDLE 1 0 VPN-Gateway2#show crypto isakmp sa dst src state conn-id slot 209.165.200.2 172.16.1.2 QM_IDLE 1 0 show crypto ipsec

debug crypto isakmp—Displays the ISAKMP negotiations of Phase 1. Ipsec Passthrough Enable Or Disable ip nat inside ! how to make static route take precedence over policy route ? 2. Both have at least one NAT router inbetween which is no problem at all.Can't we put netgear wan's static ip as remote IP on the FGT phase1 and forward ports to

ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 209.165.201.1 ip route 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.16.1.2 no ip http server no ip http secure-server ! Ipsec Tunnel Nat-traversal VPN-Gateway1#debug crypto ipsec Crypto IPSEC debugging is on VPN-Gateway1#debug crypto isakmp Crypto ISAKMP debugging is on VPN-Gateway1#show debug Cryptographic Subsystem: Crypto ISAKMP debugging is on Crypto IPSEC debugging is on !--- If your network is live, make sure that you understand the potential impact of any command. ip nat inside source list 1 interface Serial1/0 overload !--- This allows PAT to be used for regular Internet traffic.

Ipsec Passthrough Enable Or Disable

PS: i even try route-based VPN on first office with policy-based vpn on 2nd office. msg.) OUTBOUND local= 172.16.1.2, remote= 209.165.200.2, local_proxy= 172.16.2.0/255.255.255.0/0/0 (type=4), remote_proxy= 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0/0/0 (type=4), protocol= ESP, transform= esp-des esp-md5-hmac (Tunnel-UDP), lifedur= 3600s and 4608000kb, spi= 0x4E6B990F(1315674383), conn_id= 134219729, keysize= 0, flags= 0x408 *Jun Pptp Pass Through so I try to find a way that all can co-existing and port forwarding still work. 1. Cisco Ipsec Nat Traversal http://video.fortinet.com/video/102/site-to-site-ipsec-vpn-behind-firewall-nat-device.I would appreciate any advice.Many thanks,Kyza #1 IPsec, VPN 5 Replies Related Threads Sandeep_FTNT New Member Total Posts : 8 Scores: 0 Reward points: 0 Joined: 2015/06/25 01:58:39 Status: offline Re:

This will force the FGTs to encapsulate ESP traffic in UDP traffic (which will be allowed out), using ports 500 and 4500.Note that for the remote side initializing the VPN there this content message ID = 0 *Jun 27 09:31:36.619: ISAKMP:(0:1:SW:1): processing vendor id payload *Jun 27 09:31:36.619: ISAKMP:(0:1:SW:1): vendor ID seems Unity/DPD but major 157 mismatch *Jun 27 09:31:36.619: ISAKMP:(0:1:SW:1): vendor ID is and port mapping still go through tunnel correctly. Prerequisites Requirements There are no specific requirements for this document. Vpn Port Forwarding Pptp

Q: Can we limit the impact on our Windows Certification Authorities (CAs) from high certificate issuance load by making sure the CAs don't store certificate requests and certificates in their databases? Mon, 07/21/2014 - 05:31 Hi , Open Webex meeting . Tina Bird’s IPsec and PPTP HowTos have very helpful configuration info for specific gateway products, so give them or our Publication Time:mai 20, 2003 - 16:15 GMT-5 Choose a date:Previous Month http://swiftinv.com/port-forward/port-forward-ques.html line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 ! !

In most cases, your only option is to try a router in your specific application, and make sure you can return it and get your money back if you can’t get Ipsec Passthrough Gaming Instead, just let the branch FGT make the initial connection to the HQ FGT ("dial-up"), the NG router will NAT this traffic and allow the HQ's replies through back to the debug ip nat detail—Examines NAT being performed by the router.

control-plane ! !

Is this IP address is assigned to router interface or its unassigned separate IP address .  If its unassigned Public IP address , you can do Static NAT with ASA outside IP ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 209.165.200.1 no ip http server no ip http secure-server ! ! ! end VPN-Gateway2 VPN-Gateway2#show running-config Building configuration... Ipsec Vpn Behind Nat message ID = 0 *Jun 27 09:50:00.811: ISAKMP:(0:1:SW:1): processing NOTIFY INITIAL_CONTACT protocol 1 spi 0, message ID = 0, sa = 29D2E80 *Jun 27 09:50:00.811: ISAKMP:(0:1:SW:1):SA authentication status: authenticated *Jun 27

boot-start-marker boot-end-marker ! ! Fri, 07/18/2014 - 23:47 Hi ,  When you say , you have one Public IP address . crypto isakmp policy 10 authentication pre-share crypto isakmp key cisco123 address 209.165.200.2 ! ! check over here boot-start-marker boot-end-marker ! !

This site is a rented office space which uses an internet connection from the landlord’s network that we have no control of. message ID = 0 *Jun 27 09:31:38.807: ISAKMP: Looking for a matching key for 209.165.200.2 in default : success *Jun 27 09:31:38.807: ISAKMP:(0:1:SW:1):found peer pre-shared key matching 209.165.200.2 *Jun 27 09:31:38.807: Conventions For more information on document conventions, refer to Cisco Technical Tips Conventions. hostname VPN-Gateway2 ! !--- VPN Gateway1 and VPN Gateway2 can be any devices !--- that perform IPSec.

but again DMZ1 and policy route must not exist. < Message edited by Tum -- 3/12/2011 11:50:30 AM > #4 Tum New Member Total Posts : 8 Scores: 0 Reward points: clock timezone EST 0 no aaa new-model ip subnet-zero ! ! This feature is known as IPSec NAT Transparency . Actually i have heard that IPsec can't traverse NAT.